LEADER : 00000nam 2200000uu 4500 |
008 191017s2017|||| usa 000 0 eng d |
020 ^a9780691192710 (pbk.)
|
050 00 ^aJC571^bS579 2017
|
100 1 ^aSikkink, Kathryn,^d1955-^eauthor
|
245 10 ^aEvidence for hope :^bmaking human rights work in the 21st century /^cKathryn Sikkink
|
260 ^aPrinceton :^bPrinceton University Press, ^c[2017].
|
300 ^aviii, 318 pages :^billustrations ;^c25 cm.
|
490 1 ^aHuman rights and crimes against humanity
|
504 ^aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 255-300) and index.
|
505 0 ^aIntroduction: anger,hope, and the belief you can make a difference --^tResponse to the critics: how to evaluate the legitimacy and effectiveness of human rights --^tThe legitimacy ofhuman rights: diverse struggles : The diverse political origins of human rights --^tThe struggles for human rights during the Cold War --^tThe effectiveness of human rights laws, institutions, and movements --^tWhy is it so hard to measure the effectiveness of human rights law and activism? --^tWhat does and doesn't work to promote human rights? --^tMaking human rights work in the twenty-first century --^tConclusions: evidence for hope without complacency.
|
520 8 ^aA history of the successes of the human rights movement a case for why human rights work. Evidence for Hope makes the case that, yes, human rights work. Critics may counter that the movement is in serious jeopardy or even a questionable byproduct of Western imperialism. They point out that Guantanamo is still open, the Arab Spring protests have been crushed, and governments are cracking down on NGOs everywhere. But respected human rights expert Kathryn Sikkink draws on decades of research and field work to provide a rigorous rebuttal to pessimistic doubts about human rights laws and institutions. She demonstrates that change comes slowly and as the result of struggle, but in the long term, human rights movements have been vastly effective.Attacks on the human rights movement's credibility are based on the faulty premise that human rights ideas emerged in North America and Europe and were imposed on developing southern nations. Starting in the 1940s, Latin American leaders and activists were actually early advocates for the international protection of human rights. Sikkink shows that activists and scholars disagree about the efficacy of human rights because they use different yardsticks to measure progress. Comparing the present to the past, she shows that genocide and violence against civilians have declined over time, while access to healthcare and education has increased dramatically.Cognitive and news biases contribute to pervasive cynicism,but Sikkink's investigation into past and current trends indicates that human rights is not in its twilight^b
|
650 0 ^aHuman rights^xHistory^y21st century
|
650 0 ^aHuman rights movements^xHistory
|
653 ^aNew Arrivals 12-2019
|
856 40 ^3Content^uhttp://library.nhrc.or.th/ulib/document/Content/T10795.pdf
|
917 ^aKN :^c607
|
955 ^a1 copy
|
999 ^aKeyrunya
|